Double standards followed by muslims on secularism and tolerance of other religions

At the Oscar awards yesterday, Mahershala Ali became the first muslim to win an Oscar award. Amongst those who congratulated him was Pakistan's top diplomat, Maleeha Lodhi, for whom the sense of kinship with a fellow muslim made this a matter of pride.
However what followed was an excellent demonstration of muslim intolerance of other religions and rejection of the principle of equality of religions; particularly when they form the majority. It turned out that Ali was a Ahmadi muslim, who are considered heretics by sunni muslims (in Pakistan and now increasingly the world over) and have been declared non-muslims under Pakistan law.
The reaction from fanatical muslims back home in pakistan was immediate and so great that the Pakistani diplomat immediately deleted the congratulatory tweet.


And these are the same people who accuse other countries/ religions of islamophobia and want secularism and freedom of religion (BUT only as long as they are in a minority).


Something for us to ponder upon (and be careful of when we see these guys in INdia talking of brotherhood and secularism).


The link to the article is:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/pakistans-top-diplomat-in-un-deletes-tweet-on-muslim-oscar-winner/articleshow/57378072.cms

Mini pakistan’s in India

It is a barely concealed secret that most cities in India have localities which are very aptly described as mini Pakistan (for obvious reasons). These area’s are mostly ghettos where the minority community’s writ runs large and they actually behave as if they are in a muslim majority country governed by the sharia law.

These areas are typically hotbeds of crime and terrorist activities. Terrorists and their aides often use these mini pakistan’s as their base before operations or as a safe hideout after carrying out terrorist activities.

Notorious examples are Mumbra, Mira Road, and the muslim dominated areas of South Mumbai (mohammad ali road, pydhonie, naqgpada etc).

Now, while these areas have always been mini-pakistans, what is concerning is the alarming rate at which such mini pakistan’s are mushrooming all over the country.

This is an inevitable consequence of the rapidly rising muslim population (at a rate far faster than that of any other community) and the worrying proclivity of the community to harbour a false sense of grievance and become radicalised (education, freedom of religion, discrimination and standard of living has nothing to do with it; we have in 2016 seen numerous cases of Bangladeshi’s working in Singapore becoming self-radicalised and plotting terrorist attacks in Singapore and Bangladesh. This when Singapore affords them a very good standard of living , respect and dignity of labour, extremely fair treatment  – things which their own muslim majority country cannot even dream of and also in sharp contrast with the horrible treatment that their fellow muslims in arab countries mete out to foreign labourers.

This rise in the number of mini pakistan’s hit me hard when I noticed certain changes in the stretch of road from Sion station to BKC. These changes start off innocuously or as part of religious festivities, which are expected to taper out in a few days or weeks but instead keep on growing until one fine day you suddenly realise how much things have changed. One such thing is the number of green flags, a few of which were put in the days preceding ramadam and id. As id approached, the number of flags and banners slowly started increasing, getting bigger and appeared in prominent places. What people perhaps expected was that these flags would be taken down after id. IT came as a nasty shock however to see that not only were these flags and banners not taken down, but in fact their numbers have started increasing at a alarming rate, such that now - in January 2017 – the area is awash in a sea of green flags and urdu posters and banners. The placement of the banners, flags and posters is extremely provocative, as if issuing a challenge to the Hindu majority (boards of gausia masjid are put above Shree Ganesh Nagar, that too 3 lanes before where the masjid is actually situated).

The courts which are normally quite proactive when it comes to even minor infringements by the peaceful and tolerant majority is surprisingly silent and turning a blind eye to the spread of mini pakistans.

There is a limit to the tolerance of hindus and it wont be long before we see a repeat of the riots in Hyderabad 2 years back which started when muslims refused to take off green flags even 2 months after id.

It is time for hindu’s to start recognising these devious designs and counter those, physically, judicially and electorally. If allowed to continue unabated and unchallenged, our silence and tolerance will be misconstrued as cowardice and we will be subjected to more such challenges and humiliations.

Hindu’s need to immediately unite electorally and start backing the BJP en masse, which will counter the minority appeasement and vote bank politics played by communal parties like the Congress, SP, BSP, NCP, TMC etc. Otherwise our very existence will be in danger, the moment the population of the peaceful minority touches 30-40%. And the day they become a majority, we will face annihilation.

The thought is not far-fetched or alarmist; it is a sad reality which has been played out in Pakistan, Bangladesh and even in Indian states like Kashmir.

Something to ponder over and act upon.

Dalit and OBC students beaten by SFI at University of Hyderabad - and no media outrage

There is an article in todays online edition of Indian express, about Dalit and OBC students of the University of Hyderabad being beaten by members of SFI (the student wing of the communist parties).
What is shocking is the complete lack of media coverage and the continuous live media coverage about atrocities on lower castes which usually is a typical feature of any incident where the culprits are even remotely related to (or even just suspected to be) right wing organisations.


Typical double standards from our presstitutes, sold media and the terrorist defenders who pass themselves off as journalists.


The link to the article is below:
http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/hyderabad/university-of-hyderabad-dalit-obc-students-say-sfi-members-beat-them-4520022/

Double standards on offensive comments. Or what construes an offensive comment?

Shri Narendra Modi ji recently made a sarcastic remark about learning from former PM (or puppet) Manmohan Singh the art of taking a shower while wearing a raincoat. All hell broke lose immediately and various paid news media and so called journalists with an agenda immediately claimed that the comment was ill becoming the PM's office and derogatory.


This reminds me of all the previous instances when the opposition called PM Modi insulting names like hitler, dictator, maut ka saudagar, khoon ki dalali etc and no one ever objected to this and instead repeated the same insulting words ad nauseum.
To take further examples - the one and only lallo Prasad yadav once promised to make the roads of Bihar as smooth as hema malini's cheeks and not a single feminist or liberal considered this worth objecting to.


These blatant double standards expose the hidden and malicious agenda of our pseudo seculars and so called liberals, whose sole objective is to resort to any lie or falsehood to tarnish the image of Shri Modi ji, the BJP, the Hindu religion and anything related thereto.
All of this is done with the intent of ensuring that the hindu vote of split while the minority vote is always solidly consolidated behind the Congress and such other minority votebank parties.


We as educated and intelligent Hindu's have to be aware of their nefarious designs and remain solidly committed to the BJP, which is the only truly secular and nationalist party, which has the best interests of the country foremost in mind and can ensure security of Hindus.

How to answer jihadi's who call all moderate hindu's or BJP supporters as bhakt's

In the last 2 or 3 years, there seems to be this trend of labelling anyone who highlights muslim violence and terrorism/ criticises the minority vote bank parties like Congress, SP, BSP, TMC as a 'bhakt' - the assumption being that anyone criticising these things is inherently communal and a 'blind devotee of Narendra Modi' - hence the term 'bhakt'.


The question is that if praising the beneficial social/ foreign/ defence/ economic policies of the BJP or criticising minority violence or minority appeasing policies makes us a bhakt; then what does it make the other person (i.e the person who calls us Bhakts), who go out of their way to defend anti nationals and terrorists and criticise anything that is remotely nationalist in nature (including the army - perhaps the best institution on our country). These guys are then just jihadi's/ terrorists and terrorist sympathisers.


Therefore, I would suggest that the next time anyone accuses us as being a bhakt, state the obvious fact that s/he in turn is nothing but a jihadi/ terrorist/ terrorist sympathiser.


I normally don't encourage name calling but that's the only way to respond to these brainwashed fanatics because using logic to counter their arguments wont work as their minds are so closed that they will never be willing to consider any facts running counter to their flawed ideologies and hence never admit that they were wrong.


As Abraham Lincoln aptly said, "never try to reason prejudice out of a man. It wasn't reasoned into him in the first place and so it cannot be reasoned out of him".

Defending Zakir Naik - the illogical arguments put forth by peacefuls

The sad part about India today is that there is a very wide and open split between religions. Minorities - especially the peaceful ones - are openly against anything that is secular and want stridently demand the religious favouritism that had become the hallmark of all the previous congress governments minority appeasement politics.
These peaceful guys will in public make vague statements condemning terrorism and then immediately present other viewpoints to defend terrorism or raise irrelevant points or make false statements to deliberately confuse issues and make sure that the core problem of Islamic terrorism is swept under the carpet.


The most recent example is the public condemnation of the quack zakir nayak, who had been the guiding figure and motivation for terrorists involved in last weeks terror attack in a Bangladesh café (besides having instigated other indian muslims to join the IS and become terrorists to wage a war against India and other enemies of muslims).
In an effort to deflect from the fact that these terrorists had been followers of zakir nayak, a peaceful indian citizen had posted on facebook drawing comparison between the terrorist following zakir nayak and being a fan of shradha (or sonam) Kapoor and demaning whether the government will ban this actress's movies because the terrorist was her fan.
What this fool does not understand (or more likely doesn't want to understand - since his intent is to fool others and deflect the criticism of zakir nayak) is that the terrorist might have been a fan of sonam Kapoor but that was a personal preference, which did not cause trouble for anyone or cost anyone their lives. With Zakir natak, this terrorist had an ideological connect and it was zakir natak's inflammatory speeches spewing communal hatred against other religions which directly motivated the terrorist to turn to terrorism, pick up arms and hatch a terrorist conspiracy which led to the death of 20 odd people.


Ordinary Indians (hindus) need to beware of such false propaganda and malicious statements which are designed only to hide the fact that muslim terrorists are guided only by their religion, which has inculcated in them a desire to kill non muslims (to ensure the dominance of islam).
We need to continue voting for parties which espouse patriotism and national security and are committed to genuine secularism, like the BJP; and throw out pseudo secular parties like the congress, tmc, bsl, sp etc who are openly pro muslim and play minority appeasement politics simply to get muslim votes.


Let us therefore continue to solidly support the BJP and work against all so called peaceful people who stay in India but do not love India; because if we don't, these peacefuls will show their violent side the moment they become a majority (and then hindus, christians and Sikhs will all face the brutal horrors of ethnic cleansing - that have cause the population of minorities in pakistan and Bangladesh to plummet from 24% in 1947 to 3% currently).

Yet another congress politician caught exposed lying and spreading misinformation

Yet another congress leader, Selja Kumar, has been exposed lying and making false statements to discredit an hindu temple and the BJP government.
This liar had claimed that during a visit to the Dwarkadheesh temple in 2013 (3 years back, when the congress was in power), she was asked her caste. She further made an irrelevant statement just to drag the modi government in the controversy by claiming that this was an extension of the gujrat model.


Her statement was refuted by the government by producing the visitors book of the temple where she had written that she had a good darshan and praised the temple administration for the excellent upkeep and maintenance of the premises.


Upon being further questioned whether she had raised the issue with Narendra Modi, then the Gujrat CM, or with Manmohan Singh, the then PM (whos is also from her own party), the lady refused to answer the question, saying that 'she preferred not to answer the question (perhaps sensing that after being badly exposed while lying, she would have been dragged further into the mess if she had lied further).
How a person can make unsubstantiated allegations of such a serious nature, denigrating a religion, a temple, the ruling party and the PM; and then refuse to answer cross-questions is beyond me.
This however smacks of a typical congress 'manufactured controversy' where just about any falsehood and misinformation is spread and the media fans the anti BJP/ anti Hindu fire.


A few questions to ponder over:
1. If the incident happened 3 years back, why did selja wait for 3 years to raise the issue?
2. Why did she make this claim now, when the BJP is in power, instead of when the incident actually happened, when the congress was in power?
3. Why didn't she raise the issue with the  congress government/ congress PM Manmohan Singh, when it was her own party? Surely with her own party in power, it would have been easier to address the issue.
4. Does this lady have any proof that this incident actually happened? How can we believe that she is not lying, when all the above points indicate that she is lying just to create a controversy and denigrate hindu institutions and show the BJP govt in a bad light (disregarding the fact that the BJP wasn't even in power in 2013, and it was her own party which was ruling) ?
5. If she is telling the truth, why did she refuse to answer questions on whether she raised the issue with the CM or PM? Perhaps because she is afraid of being entangled further in her web of lies.




The most important point for us, the common citizens of India, is how long we will tolerate this party of anti nationals and anti hindus, whose sole aim is to lie and fool their way into grabbing power (besides their usual ploy of minority appeasement and votebank politics).


With so many such examples being exposed of late, we Hindus need to understand the ground realities and see the true face of the congress and other secular parties; and avoid ever voting them (or other self proclaimed secularists) into power.