Double standards on offensive comments. Or what construes an offensive comment?

Shri Narendra Modi ji recently made a sarcastic remark about learning from former PM (or puppet) Manmohan Singh the art of taking a shower while wearing a raincoat. All hell broke lose immediately and various paid news media and so called journalists with an agenda immediately claimed that the comment was ill becoming the PM's office and derogatory.


This reminds me of all the previous instances when the opposition called PM Modi insulting names like hitler, dictator, maut ka saudagar, khoon ki dalali etc and no one ever objected to this and instead repeated the same insulting words ad nauseum.
To take further examples - the one and only lallo Prasad yadav once promised to make the roads of Bihar as smooth as hema malini's cheeks and not a single feminist or liberal considered this worth objecting to.


These blatant double standards expose the hidden and malicious agenda of our pseudo seculars and so called liberals, whose sole objective is to resort to any lie or falsehood to tarnish the image of Shri Modi ji, the BJP, the Hindu religion and anything related thereto.
All of this is done with the intent of ensuring that the hindu vote of split while the minority vote is always solidly consolidated behind the Congress and such other minority votebank parties.


We as educated and intelligent Hindu's have to be aware of their nefarious designs and remain solidly committed to the BJP, which is the only truly secular and nationalist party, which has the best interests of the country foremost in mind and can ensure security of Hindus.

How to answer jihadi's who call all moderate hindu's or BJP supporters as bhakt's

In the last 2 or 3 years, there seems to be this trend of labelling anyone who highlights muslim violence and terrorism/ criticises the minority vote bank parties like Congress, SP, BSP, TMC as a 'bhakt' - the assumption being that anyone criticising these things is inherently communal and a 'blind devotee of Narendra Modi' - hence the term 'bhakt'.


The question is that if praising the beneficial social/ foreign/ defence/ economic policies of the BJP or criticising minority violence or minority appeasing policies makes us a bhakt; then what does it make the other person (i.e the person who calls us Bhakts), who go out of their way to defend anti nationals and terrorists and criticise anything that is remotely nationalist in nature (including the army - perhaps the best institution on our country). These guys are then just jihadi's/ terrorists and terrorist sympathisers.


Therefore, I would suggest that the next time anyone accuses us as being a bhakt, state the obvious fact that s/he in turn is nothing but a jihadi/ terrorist/ terrorist sympathiser.


I normally don't encourage name calling but that's the only way to respond to these brainwashed fanatics because using logic to counter their arguments wont work as their minds are so closed that they will never be willing to consider any facts running counter to their flawed ideologies and hence never admit that they were wrong.


As Abraham Lincoln aptly said, "never try to reason prejudice out of a man. It wasn't reasoned into him in the first place and so it cannot be reasoned out of him".

Defending Zakir Naik - the illogical arguments put forth by peacefuls

The sad part about India today is that there is a very wide and open split between religions. Minorities - especially the peaceful ones - are openly against anything that is secular and want stridently demand the religious favouritism that had become the hallmark of all the previous congress governments minority appeasement politics.
These peaceful guys will in public make vague statements condemning terrorism and then immediately present other viewpoints to defend terrorism or raise irrelevant points or make false statements to deliberately confuse issues and make sure that the core problem of Islamic terrorism is swept under the carpet.


The most recent example is the public condemnation of the quack zakir nayak, who had been the guiding figure and motivation for terrorists involved in last weeks terror attack in a Bangladesh café (besides having instigated other indian muslims to join the IS and become terrorists to wage a war against India and other enemies of muslims).
In an effort to deflect from the fact that these terrorists had been followers of zakir nayak, a peaceful indian citizen had posted on facebook drawing comparison between the terrorist following zakir nayak and being a fan of shradha (or sonam) Kapoor and demaning whether the government will ban this actress's movies because the terrorist was her fan.
What this fool does not understand (or more likely doesn't want to understand - since his intent is to fool others and deflect the criticism of zakir nayak) is that the terrorist might have been a fan of sonam Kapoor but that was a personal preference, which did not cause trouble for anyone or cost anyone their lives. With Zakir natak, this terrorist had an ideological connect and it was zakir natak's inflammatory speeches spewing communal hatred against other religions which directly motivated the terrorist to turn to terrorism, pick up arms and hatch a terrorist conspiracy which led to the death of 20 odd people.


Ordinary Indians (hindus) need to beware of such false propaganda and malicious statements which are designed only to hide the fact that muslim terrorists are guided only by their religion, which has inculcated in them a desire to kill non muslims (to ensure the dominance of islam).
We need to continue voting for parties which espouse patriotism and national security and are committed to genuine secularism, like the BJP; and throw out pseudo secular parties like the congress, tmc, bsl, sp etc who are openly pro muslim and play minority appeasement politics simply to get muslim votes.


Let us therefore continue to solidly support the BJP and work against all so called peaceful people who stay in India but do not love India; because if we don't, these peacefuls will show their violent side the moment they become a majority (and then hindus, christians and Sikhs will all face the brutal horrors of ethnic cleansing - that have cause the population of minorities in pakistan and Bangladesh to plummet from 24% in 1947 to 3% currently).

Yet another congress politician caught exposed lying and spreading misinformation

Yet another congress leader, Selja Kumar, has been exposed lying and making false statements to discredit an hindu temple and the BJP government.
This liar had claimed that during a visit to the Dwarkadheesh temple in 2013 (3 years back, when the congress was in power), she was asked her caste. She further made an irrelevant statement just to drag the modi government in the controversy by claiming that this was an extension of the gujrat model.


Her statement was refuted by the government by producing the visitors book of the temple where she had written that she had a good darshan and praised the temple administration for the excellent upkeep and maintenance of the premises.


Upon being further questioned whether she had raised the issue with Narendra Modi, then the Gujrat CM, or with Manmohan Singh, the then PM (whos is also from her own party), the lady refused to answer the question, saying that 'she preferred not to answer the question (perhaps sensing that after being badly exposed while lying, she would have been dragged further into the mess if she had lied further).
How a person can make unsubstantiated allegations of such a serious nature, denigrating a religion, a temple, the ruling party and the PM; and then refuse to answer cross-questions is beyond me.
This however smacks of a typical congress 'manufactured controversy' where just about any falsehood and misinformation is spread and the media fans the anti BJP/ anti Hindu fire.


A few questions to ponder over:
1. If the incident happened 3 years back, why did selja wait for 3 years to raise the issue?
2. Why did she make this claim now, when the BJP is in power, instead of when the incident actually happened, when the congress was in power?
3. Why didn't she raise the issue with the  congress government/ congress PM Manmohan Singh, when it was her own party? Surely with her own party in power, it would have been easier to address the issue.
4. Does this lady have any proof that this incident actually happened? How can we believe that she is not lying, when all the above points indicate that she is lying just to create a controversy and denigrate hindu institutions and show the BJP govt in a bad light (disregarding the fact that the BJP wasn't even in power in 2013, and it was her own party which was ruling) ?
5. If she is telling the truth, why did she refuse to answer questions on whether she raised the issue with the CM or PM? Perhaps because she is afraid of being entangled further in her web of lies.




The most important point for us, the common citizens of India, is how long we will tolerate this party of anti nationals and anti hindus, whose sole aim is to lie and fool their way into grabbing power (besides their usual ploy of minority appeasement and votebank politics).


With so many such examples being exposed of late, we Hindus need to understand the ground realities and see the true face of the congress and other secular parties; and avoid ever voting them (or other self proclaimed secularists) into power.

Another case of prestitution

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-outlook-apologises-to-rajnath-singh-says-he-never-called-modi-first-hindu-leader-in-800-years-2150610


Yet another case of presstitution and blatant disregard for all journalistic ethics and dropping all pretensions to objectivity - Outlook magazine on Monday night admitted to have 'erroneously' attributed to Home Minister Rajnath Singh Hindu leader remark which created a storm in Lok Sabha,

Muslim groups want minimum marital age scrapped

Yet another example of retrograde religious dogma's being contrary to the spirit of modern law and all principles of civilisation and enlightenment.
Muslim groups have demanded that the minimum age for marriage is against islam and needs to be scrapped, at least for muslims.
This demand was made in 2013 when the minority appeasing congress/ UPA government had firmly been in power for 9 years and their votebank politics had emboldened fanatical minority groups to make such unreasonable demands.


Had the BJP not won the elections, I wonder how much further these outrageous demands wold have gone and worse, the extent to which the congress/ UPA government would have bent over backwards to accommodate them, simply to retain the muslim votebank.


Link to the article - http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/muslim-groups-want-minimum-marital-age-scrapped/1/311127.html

Gender equality un-islamic and women fit only to bear children, says Muslim scholar

A sunni muslim religious scholar from Kerala, India, recently made this statement. According to this guy, gender equality is un-Islamic and that women can never equal men since they are fit only to have children.
The statement was made at a gathering of Muslim Students Federation and surprisingly not a single student objected to the remark or protested against it.
This 'muslim scholar' has demonstrated his regressive and backward mindset and ideology by earlier making statements against reservation for women (which he subsequently retracted as it threatened to snowball into a major controversy) and saying that co-education was a conspiracy to destroy islam.


What can you say about such a person and the religion? Are their thoughts and ideologies in harmony with a modern, civilised and progressive society?


What is worse is that there has been no uproar over this statement in the media or by 'secular' hindus or the so called liberals and self proclaimed intellectuals. Imagine any hindu leader making a statement even a fraction as outrageous as this and think of the furore and denunciations that would have followed, with all the blame being heaped on the BJP and Narendra Modi, besides generalising this and using this as an excuse to deride all hindus and Hinduism.


We need to beware of such regressive elements and the media which overlooks their acts, all in the name of 'secularism'.


Link to the article - http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-kerala-sunni-leader-says-women-only-fit-to-deliver-children-calls-gender-equality-un-islamic-2149865